21-Sep-1958 Letter from the Charlottesville Education Foundation to the Teaching and Supervisory Personnel of Lane High and Venable Schools

21-Sep-1958 Letter Page 1

21-Sep-1958 Letter Page 2

21-Sep-1958 Letter Page 3


Charlottesville Educational Foundatioi~ 1nc~
                                                      POST OFFlCE BOX 1133
                                  CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA
                                              September 21, 1958
    To the Teaching and Supervisory Personnel
    of Lane High and Venable Schools~
         As you know~ the Charlottesville Educational Foundation
    and the Parents Committee for Emergency E~ucation are the two
    principal organizations formed for the purpose of operating
    substitute school programs in place of those previously of-
    fered by Venable School and Lane High School.  Both organi-
    zations have limited their plans to the period when the public
    schools are closed.  The Parents Committee will go out of
    existence entirely at the end of that period.  The Foundationls
    present program will terminate at the same time, but it will
    remain in existence in case of subsequent public school closings
    and also as a vehicle for those of its members who may later
    wish to organize a new program for private schools, if suffi-
    cient demand exists~  No member, employee or patron of the
    Foundation is committed to continue with it b~yond the time
    the public schools reopen.
         The Foundation has, from its inception, offered its
    facilities to any resident of Charlottesville without regard
    to his views on the many controversial asp~cts of the Present
    school problem.  Our entire policy has been based upon~the
    belief that all of us are entitled to the maximum degree of
    independence of thought and action and of freedom of choice
    compatible with civic order~  Our membership numbers over
    2,000 and our organization is operated by nineteen directors
    representing every section of Charlottesville and holding
    widely varying opinions concerning the moral and political
    aspects of the school problem.
         In view of the similarity of aims of this Foundation and
    the Parents Coumittee during the present emergency, many per-
    sons believed that the members of both organizations could
     and should overlook any personal differences concerning the
    political aspects of the school problem and the best methods
     to be followed in arriving at an ultimate solution, in order
     that wasteful ccmpetition might be eliminated and the mutual
     desires more quickly accomplished.  During the past weekend,
    representatives of both groups conferred informally several
     times.  The purpose of these informal contacts was to attempt
     to work out an agreement that the Foundation would assume
     full authority and responsibllity for establishing and
     operating emergency school facilities ~to replace Lane High
     School , and that the Parents Committee would do the same for
     Venable School.  At the time, it was understood that these 

   negotiations were to be strictly confidential.  By some means,
   however, the press learned of them and reported them widely.
   No harm can be done now, therefore, by revealing the fact that
   the conferences took place and the essential developments
  resulting from theme
        A sincere effort to effect such an agreement upon terms
  acceptable to the governing bodies of both organizations was
  made by the representatives who acted as emissaries~  The
   governing bodies had little difficulty in reaching agreement
   concerning some differences in plamed operational methods
   for the s6hools themselves, and it appeared that full agree-
  ment was virtually certain as soon as a joint public statement
  had been approved~  The representatives of the Foundation sub-
  mitted a suggested announcement which stated quite briefly
   and slmply that both organizations were willing to overlook
   the individual differences of opinion on the school issue in
   order to discharge quickly and efficiently their common es-
   sential purpose and to promote the welfare of the children
   1n this emergency.  The statement f~rther emphasized that the
  beliefs and policies of neither organization had changed.
       The governing body of the Parents Committee refused to
   join in that suggested statement and further indicated that
   it would not enter into the basic agreement unless the Four~
   dation would join in a joint public statement reiterating
   several of the previously published views held by the members
   of the Parents Committeefs governing body with regard to the
  proper solution of the entire school problem.  The Foundation~s
  representatives considered such a joint statement unnecessary
   and irrelevant to the proposed agreement.  More importantly,
   such a statement by the Foundation would have been a complete
   violation of our basic policy of freedom of thought, choice
   and action for all our members.  The Pare 5s Committee group
  has every right to its oplnions, individually and collectively~
  but that does not include the right to force those opinions
  upon any member of the Foundation.
       I have gone to considerable length to relate to you the
  history of the recent efforts to reach an agreement between
   these two groups because I believe that you, as teachers who
   are being requested to volunteer your services, have a stake
   in the matter which entitles you to know the facts.  I believe
   you were hoping for agreemente  We would have welcomed agree-
  ment but, under the existing circumstances, the Foundati~
  has no choice except to proceed with its plans to operat~
   substitute programs for both Venable School and Lane High

School until those schools may be legally reopened~
                                  Very truly yours,

                                  Charlottesville Educational
                                  Foundation

20-Sep-1958: Letter from the Charlottesville Education Foundation to the Teaching and Other Personnel of Venable School

20-Sep-1958


Charlottesville Educational Foundation
POST OFFICE BOX 1133
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA
September 20, 1958
To the Teachers and other Personnel
of Venable School:
Since my first letter to you stating our policy regarding
employment of teachers, school closing has become an aCtUalitY·
The Foundation’s plan for providing a substitute school program
for Venable School children has also become an actuality. We are
reglstering our pupils on Monday, September 22nd. Teacher and
classroom assignments will follow when the number of pupils is
known .
We have secured the use of one facility which will house
at least 150 chlldren in a single building, the interior of which
was designed and recently used for a school. A second large build-
~ng at our disposal will house approximately 250 Children Under 0~~
roof in eight or nine classrooms~ Both of these facilities include
ample outdoor space for recreational use and exercise by the
pupils. Other school locations are available in sufficient quan-
tity so that, under our program, it will be unnecessary to teach
any classes in private residential quarters even if every child
originally enrolled in Venable School registers with the Founda-
tion~ In all of our locations we will have at least two classrooms
under the same roof. Of course we cannot duPlicate the Venable
School facilities, but we are proud of the job that we have done in
. securlng physical facilities for our program~
Some of the Venable teachers have accepted our invitation to
operate our program and other qualified persons have volunteered
their services. We are grateful to these people~ It may be, how-
ever, that we will need more teacherse In that likely event, we
respectfully suggest that all Venable School teachers who are
willing to volunteer their services during the school closing emer-
gency do so in such a manner that each organization requiring their
services will receive its fair share of available teachers in pro-
portion to the number of children enrolled in its schools~
All teachers who offer their services to this foundation may
be assur~d that any extra expense incurred for transportation or
other purposes will be paid by the Foundation, and that, should it
become necessary to pay the teachers, the Foundation will guarantee
to its teachers the continuation of their respective salaries.
Very tr~y yours,
~~~resident
Charlottesville Educational Foundation

4-Sep-1958: Letter from the Charlottesville Education Foundation to the Teaching and Supervisory Personnel of the Charlottesville Public Schools

4-Sep-1958 Letter

31-Jul-1958: Letter to Superintendant Ellis from Oliver Hill, Attorney, requesting the transfer of two students to Johnson and Lane.

31-Jul-1958 Letter


22-Jul-1958 Letter to G. W. Garner from Superintendant Ellis thanking him for his recent letter.

22-Jul-1958 Letter


22-Jul-1958: Cover letter from Superintendent Ellis to John D. Crowle thanking him for his correspondence.

22-July-1958 letter


17-Jul-1958: Charlottesville Remaps Areas Under New Plan

17-Jul-1958 Newspaper

14-Jul-1958: Letter to Charlottesville Board of Education from G. W. Garner warning that he NAACP would next demand that “Negro teachers would be employed to teach white children.”

14-Jul-1958 Letter

10-Jul-1958: Virginia Backs Plan to Avoid Segregation

10-Jul-1958 Newspaper


Virginia Backs
Plan to Avoid
Desegregation
Non·Racial Assignment Basis
Is Devised by Charlottesville
By Robert E. Baker
Stafi Reporter
Arlington County and other Virginia localities
received State guidance on the sehool segregation prob.
lem in the form of a new plan calling for strict, locallr
administered pupil assignment yesterday.

I The plan was adopted with’
Ithe State’s blessing by the ‘
ICharlottesville School Board
Tuesday night. 1
lt is designed for use in the;
three Virginia eommunities-
Arlington. Charlottesville and
Norfolk-which are under Fed·
eral Court orders to begin de·,
sel~egation in Seplember. :
The new assignment plan
does nol change Virginia’s
”massive resistance” Pollcy to·
ward desegregation. State laws ,
require lhe elosing of inte· ,
grated schools and. if they re. ~
open on a mixed basis. the
wlthholding of State school ,
funds. 1
Hopes for Delays
But the Charloltesv|Ile plan
is designed to maintain segre- ,
gaUon if it can be done on a
,basis other than race or color.!
1 The State hopes at best to’
get a delay through court chal-1
lengcs 0~ assignments. But it
also expects the school boards
to act in go~ fa~ so mem.l
bers wm not be held in CO~-
tempt of Federal Court or-
~Under the plan. if a Negro
is admitted to a white school, I
the State’s ‘·massive resist- ~
ance” laws become eSective.
. In Arlington, the Charlottes- l
Iville plan-if adopted by me| ‘
school board-w~ be ap.| l
plie~ble to the 26 new Negroj s
pup~ who have applied to en· ~
ter six white schools. ,
Some Cases Exempt ,
It is not eonsidel·ed ap-~ 2
;plicable. however, to the seven| ~
‘Negro pupils who already have’
been ordered admitted to
specjfic schools by Federal ‘
District Judge Albert V. Bryan
beeause me School Board
would be risking contempt if’
these Negroes were reassigned
to Negro schools.
Thus, while Norfolk and
Cllarlott.esville may use the
plan to W to delay any’inte-
gration, at least for a while. in
Septernber. Arlmgton appar.
~ ently cannot.
: The Charlottesville plan was
· proposed by ‘John S. BatUe
· Jr., legal advisor to the Schoo~
Board and City Attorney. Be
: fore its approval by the Board
. it was eonsidered in a confer
· ence with Attorney General
A. S. Harrison and attorneYs
for other communities faeing
desegregaUon 0 r d e r s. The
plan was formulated. with the
Governor’s cooperation.
‘It provides for a new school
zoning system and intel·views
by a 5·member commitlee with
Negroes applying to white
schools. and requires all trans·
fer applicants to take a series
of scholastic tests.
Ineludes Redistricting
The zoning system is com.
posed 0[ geographical redis-,
trlcting of elementary schools’
to rninimize the possibility of
racial mixing and other rules
which, in efrect, could result
in keeping the scllools segre·
gated. or as segregated as Pos.
sible.
Battle. warned that his plan
was ”no solution” to the num-
ber one question of how to
to keep publie schools open
and segregated in the face of
Federal Court decisions and
State laws. He said he was
”not optimistic” about the pros·
pects of Preventing the closing
of any schools, but he said he
hoped to keep closing;s to a|
minimum.
Charlottesvllle has had 31
Negroes apply for admission
to white schools and Norfolk
\ about 120. Both the Norfolk
‘ and Arlington School Boards
~ ht~ve taken no aclion on the
—————–

Pending applications and have
awaited State guidance.
They had been turning the
Negro applications over to the
State Pupil Placement Board
for proeessing. However, de·
segregation decisions by Fed.
eral judges in Virginia have ‘
ruled in effect that Negroes do
not have to go through the
State pupil plaeement proee.
dure.
Newport News and Prince
Edward County also are under
desegregation orders. But New.
port News and Warwick con.
solidated on July 1 and attor.
neys believe this will postpone
integratlon there for a year.
Federal court arguments over
a desegregation date in the
Prlnce Edward case have been
set for Monday but it appears
unlikely desegregatlon wm be
ordered in September.
Gov. .3. Lindsay Almond Jr.
re~p~~ed~~~~~3 ~
~ Picture on BZ.
l_______
‘ integration stand yesterday
‘ leren~~m~~~f~
~ Arlington Committee to Pre·
~ seme Public Schools. The
~ing ended in a ”fHendly
The nine·memher delega-
tlon, headed by 0. Glenn’
Stahl, Said t h e Governor
promised onIy that he would
enforce the laws as they now
exist a n d would preserve
peace and order.
Aimond said he received
no pracUcal solutions from
the Arllngtonians in the pub·
lic school crisis.
‘”Share Desires”
Almond said the Arlington
delegation ardently expressed
its desire to keep schools
open while the school Prob·
lem is beins solved and ”I let
it be known I share these
same ~lesires.”
The Governor said he told
them that he had no discre·
tion in preventing schools
1 from closing under State law.
~~~e’~l~t°~~~r°~
r·pen and he would not com.
mit himself in advance on
whether hc would take such
‘ action.
The Governor said he did
not anucipate any disorder
Iadding:
1 ”We are prepaxed for any
· Ieventuality .”
1 1 Almond said the Arlington
~ ,delegation said nothing to him
· Ithat would cause him to refer
5 ~ to thenl as ”integrationists.”
~ : Stahl, who said his commit.
~ tee now numbers 3000 mem·
bers. said the group’s 1egal
subcommittee \vill continue to
be “helpful”. to any person
who wishes to tost the con·
st i tu tion al ity of the sch 001
e|osing law.

9-Jul-1958: John Crowle from a Masonic Temple expresses his opposition to desegregation in this letter to Superintendent Ellis.

9-Jul-1958 Letter


Public School Board:,
Charlottesville, Virginia.
Gentlemen:
You are being faced wlth the question of mixing the negroes
and the whites, and this we are sure you are opposing.
Let me make this suggeetion. If and when a school is closed
unoer the law of Virginia you find yourself faced with raising
the money to reopen on a segregated besis, then say to the
darkies use the school building for colored people only
half the day wach d&y in the week, and no white people will
be on the premises, ana then say to the white people -use
the school building the other half of the day each day
in the week. Of course the duration of 6he school sessions
could be extended through the summer if necessary.
‘1′hi~~ e.s you know,has already been suggested, and thus you
say to th~ colored people ~you wdll thus have every prilvilege
an.d e~?ery facility the white people have~ anu there is no
answer to that, except as we all know the blacks wantto
mix wit~ the whites.
I make this suggestion to you, and I believe it will wDrk.
Of course it woul9 include all activities such as bands,
all sports, ana there would be no mixing of the races in
‘chese activities.,
Very faithfully yours,
John D. Crowle, Jr.
Masonic Temple,
Staunton, Va.